Call Us TODAY on 020 3588 4240

Proposed Leasehold Reform – Part 3

Having looked at one of the justifications for the reform I want to turn to the other, possibly, more justifiable reason for abolishing section 21. Is the fact that the Government believe that when it comes to the end of the fixed term of an AST, landlords use this leverage to effectively hold tenants to ransom by telling the tenant’s that if they do not accept the rent increase they will be out!!

Please do not get me wrong, I do not agree with any landlord that uses this position in this manner, however, I would argue that this scenario is as unlikely as it is unacceptable. Yes of course there will be some landlords that abuse this position but in the leading most landlords that have a good tenant will resist increasing the rent, even when they really should because they are happy with their tenant and don’t want to lose them.

I have no doubt that any Government official (if any are) reading this will think I am talking rubbish but the majority of landlord’s I act for have been letting the property at the same rate for the whole of the occupation of the tenant only increasing the rent when the property is relet. I appreciate that the Government won’t have just made this up so will be basing it on something. Still, I wonder whether, when they looked into this, they actually looked into whether the rent increase was actually fair and reasonable? Had these tenants been subject to reviews before? How long had their rent remained the same? I haven’t seen any data that they are relying on dealing with these points. So what are they basing it on? Is it because the tenant, who has a vested interest in the rent and wants to keep it low, advises them that the rent increase was unfair? Someone asked to pay more money thinks it’s unfair – someone holds the press!

More worryingly though I don’t think the Governments measures actually achieve the intention. As I said in the last blog, we could be coming up to a rent ‘Perfect Storm’ with rents increasing like never before. If this is the case, tenants won’t need to worry about whether they will be able to afford the rent after a rent review because they won’t be able to afford the rent before the rent review either!

Of course I appreciate that there are some rogue landlords out there who will squeeze every penny and more out of their tenants but, as I have said before, are these the type of landlord that will use section 21 to end a tenancy? I very much doubt it.

Content Writer​

You Might Also Like


The following disclaimer applies to Shergroup Limited and its platform, Please read this notice carefully before accessing or using any information provided on our platform.

  1. No Legal Advice | The information presented on, including but not limited to articles, blog posts, FAQs, and other resources, is provided for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be considered, legal advice. The information provided does not create a solicitor/client relationship between Shergroup Limited and the user.
  2. Not a Substitute for Legal Advice | The information on should not be relied upon as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified professional. The application of laws and regulations can vary based on specific circumstances, and legal advice tailored to your particular situation is crucial. Therefore, we may refer you to a member of our partner firm -Shergroup Legal – on legal matters or encourage you to take your own legal advice from your preferred advisor.
  3. No Guarantee of Accuracy | While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, Shergroup Limited does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information on The legal landscape is constantly evolving, and laws may vary across jurisdictions. Therefore, any reliance you place on the information provided is at your own risk.
  4. No Liability | Shergroup Limited, including its officers, employees, agents, and affiliates, shall not be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages arising out of your access to or use of or any information contained therein. This includes, but is not limited to, any errors or omissions in the content, or any actions taken or not taken based on the information provided.
  5. Third-Party Links | may contain links to third-party websites or resources. These links are provided solely for convenience and do not imply endorsement or responsibility for the content, accuracy, or legality of such websites or resources. Shergroup Limited shall not be liable for any damages or losses incurred as a result of accessing or using any third-party websites or resources.
  6. Changes to Disclaimer | Shergroup Limited reserves the right to modify or amend this disclaimer notice at any time without prior notice. Any changes will be effective immediately upon posting on It is your responsibility to review this notice periodically for updates.

By accessing or using, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to this disclaimer notice. If you do not agree with any part of this notice, you should refrain from accessing or using

Last updated | 19 July 2023

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this disclaimer notice, please contact us at [email protected]