Call Us TODAY on 020 3588 4240

Eviction | Re-balancing the Rights of the Parties Involved

According to today’s Telegraph newspaper, no-fault evictions are on their way out – see http://bit.ly/2ImdBAy.  As we deal with a small amount of Illegal evictions every month – usually in London – our experience is that the basis for the high court writ eviction is usually non-payment of rent.  When this happens, the landlord relies on the current legislation to enable a claim to be issued for possession leading to a possession order being made.  Both parties should follow Landlord-Tenant Law. Once the possession order is made it can take up months to obtain a date for an eviction notice from the local county court.

 

Rights and Duties of Landlords and Tenants:

Landlords are learning that they can shorten the time to get back possession if they can persuade a District Judge in the county court to allow the possession order to be transferred to the High Court for enforcement.  In asking for such an order the landlord will have to be ready to provide reasons, including financial insight on the cost of delaying eviction crisis.

The tenor of the Telegraph’s article suggests that landlords are getting eviction report too soon, or on the wrong basis.  This cannot be right.  Landlords have to obtain a possession order to even contemplate an eviction moratorium happening and we are confident most of the landlords we encounter would have preferred not to take this drastic step. 

All a landlord usually wants is the rent paid on time.  Private landlords may well be financing their property from funding which needs to be paid, and they use the rent to discharge their own obligations.  If that chain of funds is broken by a tenant refusing or unable to pay it creates a problem that the landlord must deal with.

We are also not sure that a picture of Mrs May standing in front of an EU flag looking stern is quite the right picture for this article, which is surprising as the Telegraph is usually good at capturing the spirt of a situation with its imagery.

Instead this story paints a picture of a Government who is pushing the blame of eviction on to the private rental market when in fact it is legislation which is lacking, and which is causing landlords to apply for possession orders rather too quickly for the Government’s liking.  The fact that a landlord can then seek to transfer to the High Court for enforcement is also probably not what the Government wants to see because it creates issues re-housing eviction of tenant.  We suspect the Government through its local authority framework is under pressure to put the brakes on having to find homes for the people who are made homeless by the high court eviction process.

Over the years our CEO, Claire Sandbrook, has argued for “joined up thinking” on the entire topic of possession orders leading to Writs of Possession.  As it is the entire issue of aligning possession orders is finally in front of the Civil Procedure Rules Committee and a consultation paper has been issued – see http://bit.ly/2Pdfccj.  We liked what Lord Justice Coulson had to say in his foreword to the consultation paper which reads “The CPRC recognizes that there is a balance to be struck; for example, on the one hand there may be a landlord who is owed several month’s unpaid rent and who may also be in debt as a result of the rent arrears, and on the other hand tenants or other occupiers who ought to know if and when they are to be evicted to enable them to make other provision or make their own representations to the court.  All parties should be treated fairly and with respect.”

Shergroup will be responding to the consultation paper and we encourage you to do the same if you want to share your experience of the court system of eviction law and the impact it has had on your life from your particular vantage point.  For us, we think it ridiculous that the county court bailiff system attempts to handle thousands of high court eviction order each year, when the High Court system of enforcement could be utilized to take some, or all, of the load.  Whatever the outcome of the claim for possession, an order will still need to be enforced and we believe the current consultation is long overdue in addressing the confusion caused by a two-tier eviction system.

You Might Also Like

Content Writer​

DISCLAIMER NOTICE |

The following disclaimer applies to Shergroup Limited and its platform, shergroup.com. Please read this notice carefully before accessing or using any information provided on our platform.

  1. No Legal Advice | The information presented on shergroup.com, including but not limited to articles, blog posts, FAQs, and other resources, is provided for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be considered, legal advice. The information provided does not create a solicitor/client relationship between Shergroup Limited and the user.
  2. Not a Substitute for Legal Advice | The information on shergroup.com should not be relied upon as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified professional. The application of laws and regulations can vary based on specific circumstances, and legal advice tailored to your particular situation is crucial. Therefore, we may refer you to a member of our partner firm -Shergroup Legal – on legal matters or encourage you to take your own legal advice from your preferred advisor.
  3. No Guarantee of Accuracy | While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, Shergroup Limited does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information on shergroup.com. The legal landscape is constantly evolving, and laws may vary across jurisdictions. Therefore, any reliance you place on the information provided is at your own risk.
  4. No Liability | Shergroup Limited, including its officers, employees, agents, and affiliates, shall not be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages arising out of your access to or use of shergroup.com or any information contained therein. This includes, but is not limited to, any errors or omissions in the content, or any actions taken or not taken based on the information provided.
  5. Third-Party Links | Shergroup.com may contain links to third-party websites or resources. These links are provided solely for convenience and do not imply endorsement or responsibility for the content, accuracy, or legality of such websites or resources. Shergroup Limited shall not be liable for any damages or losses incurred as a result of accessing or using any third-party websites or resources.
  6. Changes to Disclaimer | Shergroup Limited reserves the right to modify or amend this disclaimer notice at any time without prior notice. Any changes will be effective immediately upon posting on shergroup.com. It is your responsibility to review this notice periodically for updates.

By accessing or using shergroup.com, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to this disclaimer notice. If you do not agree with any part of this notice, you should refrain from accessing or using shergroup.com.

Last updated | 19 July 2023

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this disclaimer notice, please contact us at [email protected]