Call Us TODAY on 020 3588 4240

Security – But Not as We Know It | Security Companies in London

Worth Sharing?

Download Our Free E-book

Get Access to the Best Content on High Court Enforcement

When you choose Shergroup Security as your integrated security provider, you are choosing a company with heritage and integrity.

Claire Sandbrook as Shergroup’s CEO writes on the growing rise of knife crime in London and her thoughts surrounding this disturbing trend, I started work in London in 1980 – and married a Londoner – and so London is a very big part of my life. It is distressing than to see how this wonderful capital city is being blighted by the growing number of threats such as terrorism and what I perceive as another form of terrorism, and that is gangs wielding knives. I was shocked to see on SKY NEWS last week footage from a case of a “Zombie” knife attacker, whose prison sentence was found to be too lenient and was eventually increased from 2 to 3.5 years. You can see in the linked report that the attacker is brandishing his large Zombie knife in Croydon high street No one could approach the nutcase with the knife of course – he was just out of control and no police were in the immediate vicinity.


Then I read in my “go-to” source for reliable (not fake) news, The Daily Telegraph, that the Metropolitan Police are trialling facial recognition technology in the Capital as a means of strengthening their capability to identify suspects and naturally enough arrest them. A piece on the roll-out of the operation is linked here Wouldn’t it have been good to have facial recognition cameras on a network in Croydon High Street that day? There are wall-to-wall CCTV on British streets anyway – so this type of crime will be picked up somewhere on a camera, but now that criminal can be matched against the police’s national database. As a citizen, I feel the police must use every lawful tool at their disposal to fight crime and this sort of outrageous “in your face” action. We have forgotten too easily the horrific murderer of Lee Rigby in Woolwich where another couple of nutcases beheaded this wonderful young man in broad daylight for being a soldier.


Knife crime is not new to Britain, it has been steadily growing year on year. As far back as 2008 David Cameron, the then Prime Minister, declared he was bringing in tougher sentences for knife crime – see 10 years on and we are still dithering about what that sentence should really be.


Personally, I support any initiative as a law-abiding citizen to fight knife crime. I am often in London and I want to continue to feel, as I always have, that when I walk down Piccadilly or Fleet Street, I am going to be safe. I could have put money on it that the Information Commissioner’s Office would have a say on the matter, as of course the data which comes from the police operation is subject to the UK Data Protection laws. Apparently, the police decided to use this technology doesn’t have Home Office approval at the present time. I find that surprising and frankly unhelpful. You would think that the Home Office, (the equivalent of the US State Department) would be leading the debate and guidance on the use of facial recognition technology in major UK cities.


In that debate, police constabularies (police departments) should be contributing as the front-line agencies dealing with crime, and the Information Commissioner would be briefing everyone on the position of the use of this technology in relation to data protection legislation. These 3 functions, state, police and information protector must align, to achieve coherently and as far as possible transparent policies about the use of this form of technology. They should have the foresight to weigh up the pros and the cons and to communicate their agreed findings to Parliament and to the public at large.


Working as I do in London and having teams of high court enforcement agents and security officers on the streets, knife crime is a real concern. The UK has one of the most developed health and safety regimes in the world. Risk assessment in any given workplace situation is a statutory requirement but despite all that as we know, incidents reported here and even the recently tragic stabbing of PC Keith Palmer on the doorstep of Parliament show a willful behaviour to flout the law. On always that sad day in 2018 even the police couldn’t protect one of their own from a stabbing in an exposed area of the body –


So, whilst we continue to develop our policies and procedures to reduce the risk of fatalities caused by stabbing, I think the overarching approach of having facial recognition tech in place as part of a security program to handle evermore violent and public crimes on the streets is VITAL. The ability to survey large crowds of people is necessary and if the technology exists to sort the good guys from the bad guys let’s use it. I will happily surrender my human rights to protect other humans and to drive out and expose criminal behaviour in people who will not otherwise be identified.

Take action against knife crime in London. Explore Shergroup’s High Court Enforcement services for a safer city. Visit now.
Content Writer​


The following disclaimer applies to Shergroup Limited and its platform, Please read this notice carefully before accessing or using any information provided on our platform.

  1. No Legal Advice | The information presented on, including but not limited to articles, blog posts, FAQs, and other resources, is provided for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be considered, legal advice. The information provided does not create a solicitor/client relationship between Shergroup Limited and the user.
  2. Not a Substitute for Legal Advice | The information on should not be relied upon as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified professional. The application of laws and regulations can vary based on specific circumstances, and legal advice tailored to your particular situation is crucial. Therefore, we may refer you to a member of our partner firm -Shergroup Legal – on legal matters or encourage you to take your own legal advice from your preferred advisor.
  3. No Guarantee of Accuracy | While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, Shergroup Limited does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information on The legal landscape is constantly evolving, and laws may vary across jurisdictions. Therefore, any reliance you place on the information provided is at your own risk.
  4. No Liability | Shergroup Limited, including its officers, employees, agents, and affiliates, shall not be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages arising out of your access to or use of or any information contained therein. This includes, but is not limited to, any errors or omissions in the content, or any actions taken or not taken based on the information provided.
  5. Third-Party Links | may contain links to third-party websites or resources. These links are provided solely for convenience and do not imply endorsement or responsibility for the content, accuracy, or legality of such websites or resources. Shergroup Limited shall not be liable for any damages or losses incurred as a result of accessing or using any third-party websites or resources.
  6. Changes to Disclaimer | Shergroup Limited reserves the right to modify or amend this disclaimer notice at any time without prior notice. Any changes will be effective immediately upon posting on It is your responsibility to review this notice periodically for updates.

By accessing or using, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to this disclaimer notice. If you do not agree with any part of this notice, you should refrain from accessing or using

Last updated | 19 July 2023

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this disclaimer notice, please contact us at [email protected]