Method of Enforcement | Taking control of goods against a vicar

Worth Sharing?

Download Our Free E-book

Get Access to the Best Content on High Court Enforcement

Our national panel of Certified High Court Enforcement Officers will help you collect your money quickly and easily.

Taking Control of Goods Against a Vicar | Enforcement and Ecclesiastical Law 

Taking control of goods against a vicar is one of the most unusual enforcement scenarios in English law — but it is not impossible. Where a court judgment has been obtained against a member of the clergy, a specific legal process exists to enforce it. That process is governed by rules that predate modern enforcement legislation by centuries and operates outside the standard framework that applies to all other judgment debtors. 

The procedure is rare. It involves a specialist writ, the involvement of a Church of England bishop, and a legal framework rooted in English ecclesiastical law. Understanding how it works — and when the standard enforcement route applies instead — is essential for any creditor who finds themselves in this position. 

 

Why Standard Taking Control of Goods Regulations Do Not Apply to Clergy 

The standard enforcement framework for taking control of goods in England and Wales is set out in Schedule 12 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013. Under this framework, a High Court Enforcement Officer (HCEO) enforces a Writ of Control to seize and sell the judgment debtor’s goods. 

This framework does not apply to the enforcement of judgments against a vicar acting in their ecclesiastical capacity. The writ used in clergy enforcement is expressly excluded from the unified procedure in Schedule 12 and is also excluded from the Civil Procedure Rules provisions that govern standard enforcement. It is referenced in CPR Part 70 as a procedure that sits outside the modern rules. 

Key point | A judgment against a vicar is enforceable — but not through the standard Writ of Control. A separate, specialist writ must be obtained, and the enforcement is carried out by the bishop of the diocese rather than a High Court Enforcement Officer. 

 

The Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis | What It Is and Why It Exists 

The writ used to enforce a judgment against a vicar is the Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis. In Latin, ‘fieri facias’ means ’cause to be made’ — a traditional instruction to an officer to levy the amount of a judgment from the debtor’s goods. The additional phrase ‘de bonis ecclesiasticis’ specifies that the goods in question are ecclesiastical goods belonging to a member of the clergy. 

This writ was not renamed or absorbed into the modern enforcement framework when the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 replaced the former writ of fieri facias with the Writ of Control for standard debtors. Its ancient origins are reflected in the fact that the concept of ‘lay fees’ — relevant to whether the standard enforcement route can be used instead — appears in Magna Carta, dating to 1215. 

Important | The Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis is one of the rarest enforcement instruments in use in the English legal system. Its continued existence reflects the special constitutional and legal status of the Church of England and the clergy who serve within it. 

 

Vicar Debt Enforcement | The Step-by-Step Process 

The process for enforcing a judgment against a vicar follows a defined sequence. It mirrors the standard High Court enforcement process in some respects — a judgment must exist, an application must be made, and a writ must be issued — but the key executing authority is the bishop, not an HCEO. 

Step  Stage  What Happens 
1  Initial Writ application  Apply for a Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis in the same way as applying for a standard writ against any other debtor. 
2  First HCEO return  The HCEO enforcing the initial writ makes a special return confirming that no goods were recovered and — where applicable — that the vicar has no ‘lay fee’. 
3  Application for second writ  A formal application is made on the General Application form, supported by a witness statement, for permission to issue the specialist Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis. 
4  Witness statement contents  The witness statement must identify the judgment, confirm the outstanding amount (including interest and costs to the date of application), provide any other information required, and confirm that the debtor is a vicar. 
5  Court grants permission  If satisfied with the evidence, the court grants permission. It may alternatively request additional information before making its decision. 
6  Writ issued to bishop  Once issued, the Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis is sent to the bishop of the diocese in which the vicar is appointed. 
7  Bishop enforces the writ  The bishop enforces the writ in the same manner as an HCEO would enforce a standard Writ of Control, seizing ecclesiastical property if necessary, and makes a return in the same way. 

 

What Is a Lay Fee and Why Does It Matter? 

A lay fee is a payment made to a member of the clergy for their pastoral services — a form of income or property held in a non-ecclesiastical capacity. The concept appears in Magna Carta (1215) and reflects the historical distinction in English law between the ecclesiastical goods of a clergyman (held by virtue of their church office) and their private, secular assets. 

The presence or absence of a lay fee determines which enforcement route applies: 

No lay fee identified — The HCEO makes a return on the initial writ confirming no goods were recovered and no lay fee exists. This triggers the application process for the Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis, with enforcement passing to the bishop. 

Lay fee identified — Where the vicar is in receipt of a lay fee, enforcement can proceed by way of a standard Writ of Control in the normal manner. No separate bishop application is required. The lay fee constitutes secular property and is subject to the standard taking control of goods process. 

Key point | The lay fee determination is made by the HCEO at the first stage of enforcement. If lay fee income is identified, the standard High Court enforcement route applies — faster, simpler, and without the need to involve the bishop or obtain additional court permission. 

 

What Are Ecclesiastical Goods? 

Ecclesiastical goods are assets held by a vicar by virtue of their church office — property and income that derive from the clerical role rather than from private or secular sources. Examples may include stipend income, assets attached to a benefice, and goods provided for the performance of religious duties. 

The distinction between ecclesiastical goods (subject to the specialist writ) and secular assets (subject to standard enforcement) is fundamental to this process. A vicar who holds significant private assets — a personally owned vehicle, personal bank accounts, or privately purchased goods — may well have those assets enforced against through the standard taking control of goods framework, depending on whether a lay fee is identified. 

The enforcement officer and the court will need to establish the nature of the assets before determining which route applies. This is another reason why specialist knowledge of this area is essential before attempting enforcement. 

 

The Role of the Bishop in Clergy Enforcement 

Once the Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis is issued by the court, it is sent to the bishop of the diocese in which the vicar holds their appointment. The bishop then assumes the enforcement role that would ordinarily be performed by a High Court Enforcement Officer. 

The bishop enforces the writ by seizing the vicar’s ecclesiastical property and, if the judgment is not satisfied, by arranging its sale to meet the debt. The bishop also makes a return on the writ in the same manner as an HCEO would — recording what was found, what was seized, and the outcome of the enforcement action. 

This arrangement reflects the constitutional position of bishops in the Church of England as holding authority over the clergy within their dioceses. The enforcement framework uses that existing authority structure rather than creating a separate mechanism. 

 

CPR Part 70 | Where This Procedure Sits in the Rules 

Civil Procedure Rules Part 70 deals with the general rules about enforcement of judgments and orders. It acknowledges the existence of the Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis as a form of enforcement that sits outside the Schedule 12 unified procedure — confirming that the standard taking control of goods regulations and the modern writ framework do not apply to this type of enforcement. 

There is no equivalent procedure for debt enforcement against members of other religious denominations or faiths — this process is specific to vicars of the Church of England, reflecting the established church’s unique constitutional position in English law. Enforcement against clergy of other denominations would follow the standard enforcement route. 

 

When Does Standard Enforcement Apply Instead? 

The specialist writ procedure is only required where the vicar’s assets are ecclesiastical in nature and no lay fee has been identified. In several circumstances, the standard enforcement route remains available: 

  • Lay fee income exists — If the vicar receives a lay fee, a standard Writ of Control can be enforced directly without the specialist application. 
  • Privately held secular assets — Where the vicar holds vehicles, personal bank accounts, or goods purchased in a personal capacity, these may be subject to standard enforcement if they constitute lay property rather than ecclesiastical goods. 
  • Other enforcement methods — Third-Party Debt Orders (for bank accounts), Attachment of Earnings Orders (if the vicar is treated as an employee), and Charging Orders (for personally owned property) may each be available depending on the debtor’s circumstances. 

Given the complexity of determining which assets are ecclesiastical and which are secular, specialist legal advice is recommended before proceeding with any enforcement action against a vicar. 

 

Vulnerability Considerations in Clergy Enforcement 

Enforcement officers are required by the Taking Control of Goods (Fees) Regulations 2014 and the associated regulatory framework to consider whether a debtor may be vulnerable before, during, and after an enforcement visit. This obligation applies equally to enforcement against clergy as it does to any other debtor. 

The fact that a debtor holds a position of authority within a religious institution does not remove their vulnerability protections. Age, physical or mental health conditions, bereavement, and other circumstances that may affect the debtor’s ability to engage with the enforcement process must all be taken into account. 

Shergroup’s guidance on vulnerability in enforcement sets out the obligations on enforcement agents and the steps taken to identify and respond to vulnerability during the enforcement process. 

 

Statutory Notices | Requirements That Apply Regardless of Debtor Status 

Whether enforcement proceeds via the standard Writ of Control or the specialist ecclesiastical writ, statutory notice requirements must be followed. The Notice of Enforcement must be served correctly — in terms of form, timing, and address — before any attendance can take place. 

Defective notice invalidates the enforcement action regardless of the legal basis of the writ. This is a fundamental rule that applies to all enforcement types. 

Shergroup’s reference guide on statutory notices for High Court enforcement agents covers current notice requirements in detail. 

 

How Shergroup Can Help with Enforcement Against Clergy 

Enforcement against a vicar is, as the source material makes clear, extremely rare. The combination of the specialist writ, the bishop’s involvement, and the lay fee assessment makes this one of the most procedurally unusual enforcement scenarios in the English court system. The risk of procedural error — and the cost of getting it wrong — is proportionally higher than in standard enforcement. 

Shergroup has the experience and specialist knowledge to navigate this process correctly. Where this situation arises, the approach is to contact the court directly to confirm exactly how they wish to deal with the application before any steps are taken, ensuring the correct writ is applied for in the correct form and within the correct procedural framework. 

For standard High Court enforcement and CCJ transfer services, visit Shergroup’s High Court Enforcement Solutions page. 

Where it is necessary to trace a debtor or identify their assets and address before enforcement begins, Shergroup’s Find a Person service provides specialist tracing support. 

 

Understanding the Full Range of Enforcement Options 

For a broader overview of the enforcement options available once a court judgment is obtained, Shergroup’s guide on how High Court enforcement works provides a complete step-by-step reference for creditors. 

For the standard taking control of goods process — applicable to all non-ecclesiastical debtors — Shergroup’s guide on taking legal control of goods covers the regulatory framework, notice requirements, and enforcement stages in detail. 

 

Summing Up 

Taking control of goods against a vicar requires a different legal route to standard enforcement. The Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis is an ancient instrument that has survived the 2007 enforcement reforms intact. It operates outside the Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013, involves the bishop of the relevant diocese as the executing authority, and requires a specific court application supported by a witness statement. 

The standard Writ of Control may still be available where the vicar holds a lay fee or secular assets subject to normal enforcement. In all cases involving clergy, specialist advice and direct engagement with the court before issuing any application is the safest and most efficient approach. 

 

Contact Shergroup for Specialist Enforcement Advice 

If you hold a judgment against a vicar or need specialist guidance on an unusual enforcement scenario, contact Shergroup for expert advice on the correct procedure. 

You can reach us |
By Phone | 020 3588 4240
Website | www.shergroup.com , and you can chat to us from here
Email | [email protected]
Facebook | Check out Shergroup on this channel and message us
Twitter | Check out ShergroupChat on this channel and message us
LINKEDIN | Check out Shergroup’s LINKEDIN – and please FOLLOW us!
Instagram | Check out ShergroupChatter and
YouTube | Check out Shergroup YouTube Channel – and Subscribe to Our Channel!
Google My Business | https://maps.app.goo.gl/J1pUNBKfFv2SVnjQ6  

Frequently Asked Questions 

Can a bailiff enforce taking control of goods against a vicar? 

Yes — a judgment against a vicar is enforceable, but not through the standard taking control of goods process. A specialist writ called the Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis must be obtained, and enforcement is carried out by the bishop of the diocese rather than a High Court Enforcement Officer. If the vicar holds a lay fee — secular income from their pastoral role — a standard Writ of Control can be used instead. 

What is the Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis? 

The Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis is a specialist enforcement instrument used to recover a judgment debt from a vicar’s ecclesiastical goods. It was not renamed or absorbed into the modern enforcement framework under the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. It sits outside CPR Schedule 12 and is one of the rarest writs still in use in the English legal system. Enforcement is carried out by the bishop of the relevant diocese. 

What is a lay fee in the context of vicar debt enforcement? 

A lay fee is income or property held by a vicar in a secular — non-ecclesiastical — capacity. The concept originates in Magna Carta. Where a lay fee is identified during enforcement, the standard Writ of Control applies and the bishop’s involvement is not required. The HCEO makes a return on the initial writ confirming the lay fee position, which determines the correct onward route. 

Does the standard taking control of goods act apply to clergy? 

The standard taking control of goods regulations under Schedule 12 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 do not apply to the enforcement of judgments against a vicar’s ecclesiastical goods. The specialist writ procedure applies instead. However, where the vicar holds secular assets — privately owned property, personal bank accounts, or lay fee income — standard enforcement methods may still be available. 

Which religions or denominations does this procedure apply to? 

The Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis applies specifically to vicars of the Church of England. It reflects the established church’s unique constitutional position in English law. There is no equivalent specialist writ procedure for clergy of other Christian denominations, other faiths, or non-established religious institutions. Enforcement against those individuals follows the standard taking control of goods framework. 

What information is needed in the witness statement for the court application? 

The witness statement supporting the application for the Writ of Fieri Facias de Bonis Ecclesiasticis must identify the judgment or order to be enforced, state the original judgment amount and the amount outstanding at the date of the application (including accrued interest and costs), provide any other information necessary to establish entitlement to enforce, and confirm that the judgment debtor is a vicar of the Church of England. 

You Might Also Like

Content Writer​

DISCLAIMER NOTICE |

The following disclaimer applies to Shergroup Limited and its platform, shergroup.com. Please read this notice carefully before accessing or using any information provided on our platform.

  1. No Legal Advice | The information presented on shergroup.com, including but not limited to articles, blog posts, FAQs, and other resources, is provided for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be considered, legal advice. The information provided does not create a solicitor/client relationship between Shergroup Limited and the user.
  2. Not a Substitute for Legal Advice | The information on shergroup.com should not be relied upon as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified professional. The application of laws and regulations can vary based on specific circumstances, and legal advice tailored to your particular situation is crucial. Therefore, we may refer you to a member of our partner firm -Shergroup Legal – on legal matters or encourage you to take your own legal advice from your preferred advisor.
  3. No Guarantee of Accuracy | While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, Shergroup Limited does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information on shergroup.com. The legal landscape is constantly evolving, and laws may vary across jurisdictions. Therefore, any reliance you place on the information provided is at your own risk.
  4. No Liability | Shergroup Limited, including its officers, employees, agents, and affiliates, shall not be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages arising out of your access to or use of shergroup.com or any information contained therein. This includes, but is not limited to, any errors or omissions in the content, or any actions taken or not taken based on the information provided.
  5. Third-Party Links | Shergroup.com may contain links to third-party websites or resources. These links are provided solely for convenience and do not imply endorsement or responsibility for the content, accuracy, or legality of such websites or resources. Shergroup Limited shall not be liable for any damages or losses incurred as a result of accessing or using any third-party websites or resources.
  6. Changes to Disclaimer | Shergroup Limited reserves the right to modify or amend this disclaimer notice at any time without prior notice. Any changes will be effective immediately upon posting on shergroup.com. It is your responsibility to review this notice periodically for updates.

By accessing or using shergroup.com, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to this disclaimer notice. If you do not agree with any part of this notice, you should refrain from accessing or using shergroup.com.

Last updated | 19 July 2023

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this disclaimer notice, please contact us at [email protected]