Call Us TODAY on 020 3588 4240

Assured Shorthold Tenancies | ‘no fault’ section 21 eviction

Question – I am an investment advisor to a number of wealthy families and, like a lot of people, I have focussed a lot of my client’s investments around the residential property all of which are let on Assured Shorthold Tenancies.  Do you think that the abolition of the ‘no fault’ section 21 eviction is going to have a devastating effect on landlords that people are saying?  Should I consider advising my clients to start to sell up?  Everything I read on the subject is adamant that this is a disaster for landlords – is that your view?

Answer – I can only answer the 3 questions in the same way that Amy Winehouse would…’No, No, No.  As you may have seen in other blogs/articles I have written, from the outset, I have taken the view that the impact of abolishing section 21 would likely have a worse impact on tenants than it would on landlords and I have seen nothing to change my mind.

If you look at the private rental sector as a whole, the majority of landlord’s have become landlord’s in order to either capitalise on capital growth, the return on investment provided by the rent or as a contribution towards their pension.  That being the case, how many landlord’s would want a tenant to leave for ‘no reason?  Very few I would think.  Why would they want a vacant property given their objective is to make a return on their investment?

The only time that I can see the majority of landlord’s, and I would include your client’s in this, wanting to have a vacate property is if they wish to sell and believe the property is more marketable without a tenant.  As I said at the outset, the Government could not abolish the ‘no fault evictions without adding, at least, a new ground allowing evictions to take place if the landlord wished to sell and if you look at the latest proposals (click on the link below) you will see that this is exactly what the Government are proposing. Obviously, the devil is in the detail but if the proposal is enacted in the same way as it has been in Scotland then the evidence required to show that a landlord ‘is really going to sell’ is incredibly limited.

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/a-new-deal-for-renting-resetting-the-balance-of-rights-and-responsibilities-between-landlords-and-tenants/outcome/a-new-deal-for-renting-government-response#annex-a-grounds-for-possession

So if your clients can still get vacant possession if they want to sell the property what really is the problem, to landlord’s like your client’s, if ‘no fault’ evictions are abolished?  I can’t really think of one, to be honest.  In fact, the scaremongering that has been going on which has led to a number of landlord’s selling up is only going to push rents up as supply diminishes!  It will be interesting to see what is actually brought in but as I say I still think there are few better investments than property.

Content Writer​

You Might Also Like

DISCLAIMER NOTICE |

The following disclaimer applies to Shergroup Limited and its platform, shergroup.com. Please read this notice carefully before accessing or using any information provided on our platform.

  1. No Legal Advice | The information presented on shergroup.com, including but not limited to articles, blog posts, FAQs, and other resources, is provided for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be considered, legal advice. The information provided does not create a solicitor/client relationship between Shergroup Limited and the user.
  2. Not a Substitute for Legal Advice | The information on shergroup.com should not be relied upon as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified professional. The application of laws and regulations can vary based on specific circumstances, and legal advice tailored to your particular situation is crucial. Therefore, we may refer you to a member of our partner firm -Shergroup Legal – on legal matters or encourage you to take your own legal advice from your preferred advisor.
  3. No Guarantee of Accuracy | While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, Shergroup Limited does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information on shergroup.com. The legal landscape is constantly evolving, and laws may vary across jurisdictions. Therefore, any reliance you place on the information provided is at your own risk.
  4. No Liability | Shergroup Limited, including its officers, employees, agents, and affiliates, shall not be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages arising out of your access to or use of shergroup.com or any information contained therein. This includes, but is not limited to, any errors or omissions in the content, or any actions taken or not taken based on the information provided.
  5. Third-Party Links | Shergroup.com may contain links to third-party websites or resources. These links are provided solely for convenience and do not imply endorsement or responsibility for the content, accuracy, or legality of such websites or resources. Shergroup Limited shall not be liable for any damages or losses incurred as a result of accessing or using any third-party websites or resources.
  6. Changes to Disclaimer | Shergroup Limited reserves the right to modify or amend this disclaimer notice at any time without prior notice. Any changes will be effective immediately upon posting on shergroup.com. It is your responsibility to review this notice periodically for updates.

By accessing or using shergroup.com, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to this disclaimer notice. If you do not agree with any part of this notice, you should refrain from accessing or using shergroup.com.

Last updated | 19 July 2023

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this disclaimer notice, please contact us at [email protected]